Legal Opinion

Consolidated Engineering Corp. v. Nesbit

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 10, 1951No. 12582-12584PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTOVER, District Judge.

The plaintiff in the above entitled actions had among its personnel some sixteen key employees. Being unable to pay its employees additional compensation to induce them to remain in the employ of plaintiff corporation in such key positions, in lieu thereof the corporation gave to each of its sixteen key employees an option agreement, covering a period of five years, which gave to these key employees the right to purchase, at a price of $5.00 .per share, certain shares of plaintiff corporation’s common capital stock, having a par value of $1.00 per share.

Among other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slade v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pellegrino v. NesbitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Kolom v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  3. Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co. v. AndreasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  4. Harold E. MacDonald and Marian B. MacDonald v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  5. Kolom v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API