Bradford v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
The defendant argues the evidence does not support- the verdict on the issue of negligence and the wage-loss award was beyond reason and without any evi-dentiary foundation. It is also contended the permanent-injury award was grossly excessive. The plaintiff has taken a review and argues the case should have been submitted to the jury on the question of whether there was a violation of the safe-place statute in addition to common-law negligence applicable to public buses.
We consider there is credible evidence to sustain the jury finding of negligence on the part of the defendant. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Ormond v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Ferguson v. TruaxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Ennis v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Victorson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Gleason v. GillihanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Anderson v. Transit AuthorityNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Wray v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998