Smith v. Auditor General
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by Clarence B. Smith to compel Oramel B. Fuller, auditor general, to countersign a certificate and issue a warrant for relator’s salary as assistant secretary of the senate.
1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.
On or about January 10, 1911, relator was duly appointed to the office of assistant secretary of the senate. On February 2d there was issued to him, under the provisions of section 13, 1 Comp. Laws, being section 3 of Act No. 3, Session Laws of 1873, as amended by Act No. 85, Pub. Acts 1907, a certificate, signed by the president and secretary of the senate, that there was due to relator for services as such assistant secretary the sum of $60 for the salary period, January 24, 1911, to February 2, 1911, inclusive. The senate was in actual session on each day during said period, except…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex parte CowertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Moog v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Davock v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Ex parte PickettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Attorney General v. State Board of AssessorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Richardson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Walker v. Wolverine Fabricating & Mfg Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Wolverine Golf Club v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Durant v. Department of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Shaw v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.