Legal Opinion

Ricker v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 14, 2009PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated May 12, 2008, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. “[T]here is no ‘minimal dimension test’ or per se rule that a defect must be of a certain minimum height or depth in order to be actionable” (Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976, 977 [1997]). Rather, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trincere v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Caldwell v. Village of Island ParkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Mishaan v. TobiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Boxer v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Portanova v. KantlisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bolloli v. Waldbaum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Milewski v. Washington Mutual, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Turuseta v. Wyassup-Laurel Glen Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Gotay v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Platkin v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API