Rust & Johnson v. Woolbright
Supreme Court of Georgia
Parties. Bond for titles. Vendor and purchaser. Before Judge Kiddoo. Terrell Superior Court. November Term, 1874. To report this case would simply be to repeat the above head-note.
1Opinion of the Court
McCay, Judge.
We think there was error in refusing permission to these parties to come into this litigation. As we understand the case made by the record, the defendant had set up a special plea, as though he had filed a bill in equity, which he may do under our law. In this plea was involved the whole question, not only what were the plaintiff’s rights in the land, but whether ho did not hold it subject to the defendant’s right to a deed on the payment of the purchase money. The plea prayed a deed, and alleged he was ready to pay the whole balance of the purchase money due. These parties are…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Dunson v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Walker v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Potts v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.