Legal Opinion

Gasner v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1926No. Appeal, 221PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

John Pierce and Minnie, his wife, were the owners by entireties of a house in Mahanoy City. On October 5, 1922, the former, in his own name, leased the property to Joseph Gasner for a monthly rental. The sum agreed upon was turned over to him until February 5,1923, but for the two months following was paid to the wife, the tenant believing this course to be proper since the lease, though' executed by the husband, was in right of both. Thereafter, Pierce caused a warrant of distress to be issued for unpaid rent, insisting that he alone was entitled to that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Beihl v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. O'Malley v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Bramberry's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. McCurdy & Stevenson v. CanningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Meyer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Gallagher EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Schweitzer v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
  5. Iscovitz v. FildermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API