Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1935No. Crim. 2722PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

Defendant by information was charged with a felony, to-wit, receiving stolen goods, and with four prior convictions of felonies in other states. He the prior convictions and was convicted on the primary charge and sentenced as an habitual criminal. From this judgment he appealed. (People v. Moore, 137 Cal. App. 130 [30 Pac. (2d) 79].) The judgment was affirmed, and thereafter, he petitioned the superior court in which he had been tried and convicted, for the issuance of a writ of error, coram nobis. The point of the petition is that three of the prior convictions with which…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People v. ManriquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re SeeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. LumbleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. In Re HarincarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API