Legal Opinion

Union Portland Cement Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1920No. 3452PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Original application by the Union Portland Cement Company against the Public Utilities Commission of Utah for writ of prohibition to restrain defendant from exercising jurisdiction to pass upon the reasonableness of a certain electric light and power contract.

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition prohibiting and restraining the Public Utilities Commission of Utah (hereinafter called the commission) from assuming or ex-*177erasing jurisdiction to pass upon the reasonableness or unreasonableness of a certain contract described in the com-paint. The complaint shows that, plaintiff is, and at all times referred to has been, a corporation engaged in the manufacture of cement in Morgan county, Utah; that on or about the 23d day of November, 1912, plaintiff entered into a contract with the Utah Power Company, a corporation organized and existing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lundberg v. Green River Irrigation DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Campbell v. DurandUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co. v. Kansas City Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  4. State ex rel. Carrigan v. BowmanUtah Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McGrew v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Heber Light & Power Co. v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. United States Smelting, Refining & M. Co. v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Utah Copper Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Bankers' Trust Co. v. District Court of Weber CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API