Baker v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMerritt, J.
The defendant was convicted under an indictment which charged that he did distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic or spirituous liquor subsequent to the 25th day of January, 1919.
pi] The demurrers to the plea in abatement were properly sustained. Wesley Powell v. State, ante, p. 101, 90 South. 138.
The demurrers to the indictment were properly overruled. Under section 7139 of the Code it was not necessary to allege the exact date on which the offense was committed. See, also, cases of Dewey Laminack v. State, ante, p. 399; 92 South. 502, and George Laminack et al. v. State, ante, p. 400, 92…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Powell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Holt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Brigman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Laminack v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Laminack v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Griffin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
- Connor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923