Legal Opinion
Laminack v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 1922No. 7 Div. 773PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cleburne County; A. P. Agee, Judge. Dewey Laminack was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. The indictment is void and will not sus-, tain the judgment. Ante, p. 217, 90 South. 16; 17 Ala. App. 464, 86 South. 172; 16 Ala. App. 534, 79 South. 314; 88 South. 362; 159 Ala. 71, 48 South. 864, 133 Am. St. Rep. 20; 158 Ala. 44, 48 South. 505.
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
[1] This appeal is upon the record, there being no bill of exceptions.
The indictment upon which the defendant was tried and convicted contains two counts as follows:
“The State of Alabama, Cleburne County. No. 12.
“Circuit Court, January Term, 1921. “The grand jury of said county charges that before the finding of this indictment, Dewey Laminack, whose true name is to the grand jury unknown otherwise than as stated,, distilled, made, or manufactured alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol.
“Second. The grand jury of said county further charge…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Miller v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Howard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- Glenn v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hill v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
- Farrister v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Baker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Reeves v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
- Ex Parte LaminackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922