Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Swan v. Cameron

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1845PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was an application to this Court for a writ of mandamus to command the Sheriff of Pike county to receive a bail bond executed by the defendant in attachment, and to release the property attached. The parties appeared and discussed the merits of the application, and the Court determined it, as if the motion was for a peremptory mandamus, which determination was adverse to the application, with an award of costs, against the relator.

1Opinion of the Court

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Treat, J.*

On the 27th day of December, 1845, John Baldwin commenced an action of assumpsit in the Pike Circuit Court against Elisha Swan. On the same day Baldwin filed an affidavit, in which he stated that Swan was indebted to him in the sum of $1250; and as he verily believed, Swan intended to depart from the State, and remove his property therefrom. Baldwin gave the requisite security, and a writ of attachment was issued against the testate of Swan, in aid of the action of assumpsit. To this writ the Sheriff made return, that he had summoned certain…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baird v. TriceTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Hannahs v. FeltSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  3. Northwestern Forwarding Co. v. Mahaffey, Slutz & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. McFadden v. BlockerCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1899
  5. Southern California Fruit Exchance v. StammNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API