Commonwealth v. Roth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.
The Commonwealth has petitioned pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, asking this court to set aside “partial verdicts” taken after a deliberating jury twice reported that they were deadlocked. A single justice of this court reserved and reported the case to the full bench. While we agree with the Commonwealth that the judge erred in taking “partial verdicts” on lesser included offenses within a single indictment, principles of double jeopardy preclude retrial of the defendant on the offenses as to which the jury rendered verdicts of not guilty. Although the judge should not have asked for or taken…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Commonwealth v. RodriquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. BoettcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Commonwealth v. ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FigueroaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Colorado v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Blueford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
- Daniels v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.