Legal Opinion

People v. Murray

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1994No. B075104PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORTEGA, J.

David Michael Murray appeals from the judgment entered following his resentencing resulting from a remand after his earlier appeal. Murray was sentenced for several theft-related felonies and misdemeanors. Murray received an aggregate sentence exceeding that which could have been imposed under the double-the-base-term (DBT) limitation (Pen. Code, § 1170.1, subd. (g)) 1 had all the charges been felonies. We agree with Murray that the DBT aggregate sentence limitation applies to mixed felony and misdemeanor sentences, and the trial court erred in imposing a greater sentence. We…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. LandryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. TravisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. ErdelenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API