Francis Gerard Janson, P.C. v. Frost
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
The appellant, Francis Gerard Janson, P.C., has filed an appeal from the order granting the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer of the appellees, Mark B. Frost & Mark B. Frost, Joseph Demesquita & R. Lee Rudow, individually and a partnership, trading as Frost, Demesquita & Rudow. We affirm.
When reviewing preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, the question is whether, assuming the facts averred in the complaint to be true, the law is clear that no recovery is permitted. A demurrer admits every well-pleaded fact and all inferences reasonably deducible…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Waterman v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Recht v. Clairton Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Slater v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Walton v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Sundheim v. Beaver County Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Corestates Bank, N.A. v. CutilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- McDermott v. Party City Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- First Home Savings Bank, FSB v. NernbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Com. v. Roncase, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Knorr v. Knorr, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Columbia County2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.