Legal Opinion

State v. Havelka

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 13, 1985No. 22315PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was held in contempt of court because her manner of dress was unacceptable to trial judge. We reverse.

Appellant accompanied a co-worker to the courthouse and remained in the hallway while her co-worker entered the courtroom for a settlement hearing. The trial judge refused to conduct the settlement hearing, and found appellant’s coworker in contempt of court because her clothes were unsuitable. He then left the bench. Appellant entered the courtroom during the recess. When the trial judge re-entered the courtroom, he held appellant in contempt of court because her manner of dress…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WeinbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. People v. WattsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BrandtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Stone v. Reddix-SmallsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Brandt Ex Rel. Estate of Brandt v. GoodingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. In Re BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Rhoad v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API