Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Goza v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1998No. 73153Published

1ConcurrenceGerald M. Smith, Senior Judge

I reluctantly concur in the opinion of Judge Teitelman, but write to express my reservations about the law that has been explicated in this area by the courts.

It is usual that automobile policies provide insurance for the named insured when operating a non-owned vehicle. Because such operation is normally with the permission of the owner of the other vehicle the liability policy of that vehicle normally also provides coverage for the permittee’s operation. That concept has been carried forward into under-insured motorist coverage as evidenced by the policy before us. The named insured and any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. General Accident Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Zemelman v. Equity Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Krenski v. AubuchonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SommersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Jackson v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API