Legal Opinion

Mackenzie v. Eschmann's Executors

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 6, 1917PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, No. 2).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William; Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming on the cross-appeal and reversing on the original appeal.

On July 25,1911, F. W. R. Esehmann and E. A. Eschmann executed and delivered to E. F. Dunstan their promissory note, whereby they agreed to pay to the order of E. F. Dunstan, on or before thirty days after the date thereof, the sum of $7,500.00, with interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum. The note was secured by 130 shares of the capital stock of A. Engelhard & Sons Company, a Louisville corporation. 'The note bears the endorsements of E. F. Dunstan and H. L.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnard v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Hartford Life Ins. v. HanlonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Muir v. EdelenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Sanford Construction Co. v. S & H CONTRACTORS, INC.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  3. Dolle v. Melrose Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Ford v. OttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Commercial Security Co. v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API