Legal Opinion

Schiff v. Schindler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1929No. Appeal 12PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Appellant, William Penn Title and Trust Company, hereinafter called the bank, seeks by this appeal the review of an order made by. the municipal court of Philadelphia County making absolute appellee’s rule for judgment against it as garnishee for want of sufficient answers to interrogatories in attachment execution.

On December 2, 1926, the plaintiff took judgment against the defendant for the sum of $194.58 for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. On September 20, 1928, an attachment execution was issued and the hank was summoned as garnishee. In its answer to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brothers v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Kurtz v. County National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Manufacturers' National Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Thompson v. Hazelwood Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frazier v. BergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Barsco, Inc. v. HWW, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. General Electric Credit Corp. v. TarrDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Valiant Co. v. Pleasonton & Pa. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Southwark National Bank v. BeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API