Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. County National Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1927No. Appeal, 60PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The Gearhart Knitting Machine Company is a Pennsylvania corporation, engaged in the manufacture of machines for making hosiery which it sells with yarn to be used in connection therewith, and has its principal place of business in Clearfield. Its banking was carried on with the County National Bank, where obligations were discounted and deposits kept. On July 20, 1925, notes to the amount of $100,000, partly in renewal of earlier ones, had been accepted, all of which became due in the following November. It had on the date mentioned $7,195.97 on deposit, and two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brothers v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Chipman & Holt v. Ninth N. BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Appeal of the Farmers' & Mechanics' BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  4. Manufacturers' National Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  5. Dougherty Bros. & Co. v. Central National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. National Bank of Germantown & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Valiant Co. v. Pleasonton & Pa. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Schiff v. SchindlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Thomas v. Potter Title & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Anthracite Trust Co. Mears's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API