Legal Opinion
Jimenez v. Protective Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 29, 1992No. E007527PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DABNEY, Acting P. J.
Defendant Protective Life Insurance Company (Protective) appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Manuel Jimenez. Protective contends the trial court erred in granting summary adjudication on the issue of Jimenez’s entitlement to the proceeds of an insurance policy on the life of his debtor, Kevin Breton. Protective argues: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in granting a motion for summary adjudication rather than summary judgment; (2) a creditor has an insurable interest in the life of his debtor only in the amount of the debt; (3) in granting the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United Community Church v. GarcinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Cammack v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Exchange Bank v. LohSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Slovensky v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Hawkins v. WiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- UDC-Universal Development, L.P v. CH2M HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- 2004 Stuart Moldaw Trust v. XE L.I.F.E., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Estate of Bean v. HazelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.