Dorothy Singleton v. Hilda Gendason and Edward Gendason
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
The appellants appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the appellees, the Gendasons, in a housing discrimination suit brought under Title VIII of the 1968 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (1973) and under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (1974). The district court held that the single-family exemption, 42 U.S.C. § 3603(b)(1) (1973), removed the appellees’ conduct from Title VIII; and, without further comment, that the appellants’ Section 1982 claim was similarly barred. Apparently, the lower court concluded that since Title VIII and Section 1982…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. M. E. DibbleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- D. C. Williams Et Ux. v. The Matthews CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Zuch v. HusseyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
- Island Equipment Land Co., a Corporation, and Pacific Retread, Inc., a Corporation v. Guam Economic Development Authority, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by9 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Chicago ClubCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Columbus Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Hogar Agua Y Vida en El Desierto, Inc. v. Suarez-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Whisby-Myers v. KiekenappDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- United States v. HyltonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.