Legal Opinion

Dorothy Singleton v. Hilda Gendason and Edward Gendason

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1976No. 75-1103PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

The appellants appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the appellees, the Gendasons, in a housing discrimination suit brought under Title VIII of the 1968 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (1973) and under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (1974). The district court held that the single-family exemption, 42 U.S.C. § 3603(b)(1) (1973), removed the appellees’ conduct from Title VIII; and, without further comment, that the appellants’ Section 1982 claim was similarly barred. Apparently, the lower court concluded that since Title VIII and Section 1982…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. M. E. DibbleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. D. C. Williams Et Ux. v. The Matthews CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  4. Zuch v. HusseyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
  5. Island Equipment Land Co., a Corporation, and Pacific Retread, Inc., a Corporation v. Guam Economic Development Authority, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Chicago ClubCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. Columbus Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Hogar Agua Y Vida en El Desierto, Inc. v. Suarez-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Whisby-Myers v. KiekenappDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  5. United States v. HyltonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API