Commonwealth v. Andre
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BOWES, J.:
The Commonwealth appeals the trial court’s November 6, 2009 order declaring a mistrial after the jury, in the second phase of a bifurcated trial, could not determine whether Saphira Andre was legally insane. After careful review, we affirm.
The salient factual and procedural background is as follows. The Commonwealth originally charged Appellee with arson en dangering persons, 1 arson endangering property, 2 criminal mischief 3 and risking catastrophe. 4 Subsequently, the Commonwealth dropped the charges of arson endangering property and risking catastrophe. The charges…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Clark v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. TrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AndrewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. GentrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. GainesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. BanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.