L. Martin Co. v. L. Martin & Wilckes Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Final hearing on bill, answer, replication and proofs taken in open court.
1Opinion of the Court
Stevenson, Y. C.
The evidence in this 'case which is very voluminous, in my judgment establishes a plain case of fraud, and an equally plain violation cf the complainant’s rights in respect of its corporate name vested in it by virtue of the provisions of the eighth section of the Corporation act. P. L. 1896 p. 280 § 8. An appeal having been taken from the decree of this court a statement of the "reasons’’ therefor becomes necessary.
Inasmuch, however, as fee complainant’s right to injunctive relief, which manifestly was the principal relief for which its *41bill was filed, has become an academic…
2Cited by14 opinions
- John R. Thompson Co., Doing Business as and Through Its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Holloway House, Inc. v. Mrs. Lee Holloway, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Howards Clothes, Inc. v. Howard Clothes Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Hat Corporation of America v. DL Davis CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1933
- Clairol Inc. v. Cosmetics PlusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Hoyt Heater Co. v. HoytCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.