Legal Opinion

Wight v. Davis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1947No. 15746PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) “In order for prescription to be a foundation of a valid title, there must be actual adverse possession for the period of twenty years, unless such possession is under color of title, in which case the period of time is reduced to seven years; and- in the event possession is asserted to have been under color of title, the actual limits described in the writing set up as color will not be extended to embrace other land, not included in the writing, merely because such land lying beyond the limits described in the writing has been taken…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peeples v. RudulphSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Barfield v. BirrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Walton v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. LaRoche v. FalligantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. AltmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. WightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Crawford v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Spillers v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Harrison v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API