Crawford v. Cook
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
1. “Where each of two coterminous proprietors recognizes the ownership of the other, and that the tract of each is bounded by that of the other, the ascertainment of the true line between them fixes the extent of their respective tracts.” Phillips v. O’Neal, 87 Ga. 727 (13 S. E. 819); Richardson v. Pitts, 127 Ga. 107 (56 S. E. 105); Shirley v. Byrd, 162 Ga. 598, 604 (134 S. E. 316).
2. Where, as here, the real plaintiff and the defendants in the present action in the fictitious form of ejectment stipulated that they were coterminous owners and that the only question at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brown v. HesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Phillips v. O'NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Shirley v. ByrdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Wight v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Price v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holland v. ShackelfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Forte v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Rutland v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Clay v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.