LaRoche v. Falligant
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint for land. Before Judge Cann. Chatham superior court. May 29, 1907.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
1. In order for prescription to be a foundation of a valid title, there must be actual adverse possession for the period of twenty years, unless such possession is under color of title, in which case the period of time is reduced to seven years; and in the event possession is asserted to have been under color .of title, the actual limits described in the writing set up as color will not be extended to embrace other land, not included in the writing, merely because such land lying beyond the limits described in the writing has been taken possession of under a mistake and occupied' for over…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Riley v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Moore v. CareySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Shiels v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Howard v. ReedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Doe ex dem. Keel v. RoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Walton v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Bridges v. BrackettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- MacDougall v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Nilson Bros. v. KahnIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Waxelbaum v. GunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.