Legal Opinion
United States v. Siegal
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 5, 1997No. Criminal 97-10002-PBS-1, 97-10002-PBS-2 and 97-10002-PBS-7PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT ANN ROCHELLE SIEGAL’S MOTION FOR FURTHER RELEASE OF ASSETS (Docket No. 184)
SARIS, District Judge.
Defendant Ann Rochelle Siegal has filed a motion for release of three assets which were restrained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(d)(1)(A) by a post-indictment court order dated January 6, 1997. After three hearings, on January 28, 1997, February 5, 1997 and March 20, 1997, and review of the affidavit of defendant Ann Rochelle Siegal, this Court ALLOWS the motion in part.
BACKGROUND
In the Indictment returned on January, 3, 1997, the grand jury charged defendants Martin Siegal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, Banco Cafetero Colon, Defendants-In-Rem-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Clarence Jay Crozier, Manuel Isadore Pine, Alan Terry Stein, and Florence Margaret WolkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Steven B. Tencer and Ronald Lazar, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. HydeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003