Legal Opinion
People v. K.U.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Miriam R. Best, J.
For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence is denied. The People’s motion to close the courtroom during the testimony of the undercover officer is granted. Defendant’s motion to allow an unlimited number of Legal Aid Society lawyers to be present in the courtroom during the undercover officer’s testimony is denied.
This court held a MapplDunaway /Hinton hearing on February 9, 2012. Detective Jason Duval testified on the suppression issues and Undercover Officer 163 (hereinafter, UC 163) testi*553fled relative to the People’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. BerriosNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. KetchamNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. MennerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
- People v. Menner (Dion)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016