Legal Opinion

Salmon River-Grande Ronde Highway Improvement Dist. v. Scott

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding to compel the defendant commissioners of the Oregon State Highway Commission to pay to the plaintiff highway improvement district, in compliance with chapter 298, G. L. 0.1933, the sum of $3,150.29, as specified in said act. A demurrer to the alternative writ was overruled and, upon refusal of the defendants to plead further, thq circuit court ordered and adjudged that a peremptory writ issue. Defendants appeal.

It is conceded that the decision of this case hinges upon the constitutionality of the act purporting to authorize the payment of this money. Chapter 298,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Mitchell v. LowdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Waterloo Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. ShanahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Kinney v. AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Miller v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pawnee County, Excise Board v. KurnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Ram Development Corp. v. Siuslaw Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API