Legal Opinion
Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. Wysocki
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 6, 1996No. File Nos. CV9677652, CV9677721PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStanley, J.
The plaintiffs, Norfolk and Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Norfolk) and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Liberty), have applied to vacate an uninsured motorist arbitration award. The defendant, Craig Wysocki, moves to confirm the award.
The parties stipulated to the following facts. On October 29, 1989, while on a public road in Durham, the defendant was injured when an all-terrain vehicle owned and operated by him collided with another all-terrain vehicle owned and operated by Hans Pedersen. Although both all-terrain vehicles were uninsured, at the time, the defendant was the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Levine v. MasseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. WysockiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. ZasunConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Scalise, No. Cv 98-0491778s (Dec. 18, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000