Legal Opinion

People v. Hunts

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Colleen McMahon, J.1

In this rare prosecution under New York’s enterprise corruption, or "Little RICO” statute a key cooperating witness has asserted attorney-client privilege to avoid answering questions that are highly relevant to establishing his motive to falsify his testimony. For the reasons stated below, I hold that the defendants’ Sixth Amendment right of confrontation would be impaired if the witness were permitted to invoke the privilege, and I order him to answer questions about his awareness of the penalties he faced if he did not sign a cooperation agreement…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Priest v. HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. ChinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. BergNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Rossi v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. FarberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. Vespucci, New York County Courts2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API