People v. Hunts
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Colleen McMahon, J.1
In this rare prosecution under New York’s enterprise corruption, or "Little RICO” statute a key cooperating witness has asserted attorney-client privilege to avoid answering questions that are highly relevant to establishing his motive to falsify his testimony. For the reasons stated below, I hold that the defendants’ Sixth Amendment right of confrontation would be impaired if the witness were permitted to invoke the privilege, and I order him to answer questions about his awareness of the penalties he faced if he did not sign a cooperation agreement…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Priest v. HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. ChinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. BergNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Rossi v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. FarberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. Vespucci, New York County Courts2002