Legal Opinion

City of Greensboro v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1955No. 676PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

In the construction of the Act our chief concern is to ascertain the legislative intent. As stated by Stacy, C. J., in Trust Co. v. Hood, Comr. of Banks, 206 N.C. 268, 113 S.E. 601: “The heart of a statute is the intention of the law-making body.”

Rules of statutory construction relevant here are stated succinctly by Johnson, J., in Cab Co. v. Charlotte, 234 N.C. 572, 68 S.E. 2d 433, as follows:

“It is an accepted rule of statutory construction that ordinarily words of a statute will be given their natural, approved, and recognized meaning. Commissioners of Johnston County v. Lacy, 174 N.C.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Commissioners of Johnston County v. LacySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Adams v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Brumley v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. In Re a Filing Made by the North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Lafayette Transportation Service, Inc. v. County of RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API