Legal Opinion

United States v. David Holleman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 27, 2014No. 13-1317PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYE, Circuit Judge.

David Holleman entered a conditional plea of guilty to possessing marijuana with the intent to distribute, reserving the right to appeal the district court’s 1 denial of a motion to suppress evidence found in Holleman’s vehicle while it was parked in a hotel parking lot. Holleman also sought to suppress incriminating statements he made to police officers before they searched his vehicle. In this appeal, Holleman claims the officers violated his constitutional rights on a number of grounds. Finding no constitutional violations, we affirm.

Í

On May 8, 2012, Holleman was driving…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. RochaNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  3. United States v. Patrick WintersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Gregory GivensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. LoughnaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API