Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Martin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven

The two above-entitled suits were instituted to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs when a hotel alleged to have been owned by defendants caught fire and burned, at a time when they were guests therein.

On the trial, at the conclusion of all the evidence, the trial judge sustained the motion of defendants for a directed verdict in their favor, and the suits were dismissed. Plaintiffs seasonably moved for a new trial, which motions were overruled by the court on August 24, 1936. The following* provision is contained in the order overruling the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rush v. RushTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Scopes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Upchurch v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Justus v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Lawson v. American Laundry MacHinery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. BlackburnTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Thomas v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Pairamore v. PairamoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Dewees v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  5. Bailey v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API