Gillespie v. Martin
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven
The two above-entitled suits were instituted to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs when a hotel alleged to have been owned by defendants caught fire and burned, at a time when they were guests therein.
On the trial, at the conclusion of all the evidence, the trial judge sustained the motion of defendants for a directed verdict in their favor, and the suits were dismissed. Plaintiffs seasonably moved for a new trial, which motions were overruled by the court on August 24, 1936. The following* provision is contained in the order overruling the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rush v. RushTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Scopes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Upchurch v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Justus v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Lawson v. American Laundry MacHinery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blackburn v. BlackburnTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Thomas v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Pairamore v. PairamoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Dewees v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- Bailey v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.