Legal Opinion

Parker v. Tax Commission

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1928No. 52; No. 53PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per. Curiam:

The writs of error are dismissed for want of a properly presénted substantial -federal question, on the authority of (1) St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. Co. v. Shephard, 240 U. S. 240; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City *567of Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1; (2) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry., 228 U. S. 326; Marvin v. Trout, 199 U. S. 212.

Mr. Horace Andrews, with whom Messrs. Marion V. Semple and T. G. Thompson were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Virgil H. Gibbs, with whom Mr. Edward C. Turner was on the brief, for defendants in error.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of CarrolltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Marvin v. TroutSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Squier v. MartinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
  2. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Thayer-MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Mittry Bros. Const. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. Pflueger v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Squier v. MartinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942