Legal Opinion

Stern v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 27, 1929PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBijue, J.

This action involves the single question — whether the payee of a check whose name has been forged can recover the amount from the drawee bank or the intermediate parties who have cashed the check unless he promptly communicates to them all information he obtains for the purpose of enabling such parties possibly to recoup their loss.

In this case the plaintiff payee’s name was forged about June 1, 1928. On June 12, 1928, plaintiff began an action against one Handler, who had cashed the checks for the forger and had deposited them in his bank, the defendant, which acted as mere collecting bank,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. &198tna National Bank v. . Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Knox v. Eden Musee Americain Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Thompson v. . SimpsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Soma v. HandrulisNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Lindsley v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Rosacker v. Commercial State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API