Legal Opinion
Benitez v. Dunevant
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 2000No. CV-98-0540-PRPublished
1Opinion of the Court
7 P.3d 99 (2000)
198 Ariz. 90
Daniel Paul BENITEZ, Petitioner,
v.
The Honorable Thomas DUNEVANT III, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge,
The Phoenix City Prosecutor's Office, Real Party in Interest.
No. CV-98-0540-PR.
Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.
July 31, 2000.
Neal W. Bassett and Mariscal Weeks McIntyre Friedlander PA by Dominica Minore Bassett, Phoenix, Attorneys for Petitioner.
Roderick G. McDougall, Phoenix City Attorney by Gregory L. Hanchett, F. Tyler Rich, Assistant City Prosecutors, Phoenix, Attorneys for Real Party in…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rothweiler v. Superior Court of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Goldman v. KautzArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- O'NEILL v. MangumArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Bruce v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.