Legal Opinion
Morelli v. Alexander
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 4, 1996No. 95 CV 7057PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PARKER, District Judge.
This action for mandamus is before this Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6). Pro se Plaintiff John D. Morelli (“Morelli”) brings this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 to compel Defendants, Eugene Alexander, Arthur L. Brunwasser and Carol M. Landy, agents of the Internal Revenue Service (“the Agents”), to strictly comply with the Internal Revenue Code and regulations.
Morelli charges that the Agents violated various duties under the Internal Revenue Code when they sent him several official notices without…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jack Randell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Michael J. Geiselman v. United States of America, Michael J. Geiselman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
- In Re Scott Cable Communications, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
- Stockton v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Thompson v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Fisher v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.