Tetlak v. Village of Bratenahl
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
This matter concerns the taxable status of certain income received by appellee, Joseph Tetlak, from Willow Hill Industries, Inc. in the tax years 1990, 1991, and 1992. Tetlak resides in the village of Bratenahl (“village”), the appellant herein, and was employed by Willow Hill, a Subchapter S corporation in which he owns stock, located in Willoughby, Ohio. During those years, Tetlak received both a salary from Willow Hill and a share of its earnings. Tetlak paid municipal residence tax on his salary but not on his share of the earnings received from Willow Hill.
In 1994, Tetlak received three…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bufferd v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gitlitz v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Agley v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Krehnbrink v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Tetlak v. BratenahlOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- MacDonald v. Shaker Hts. Bd. of Income Tax Rev. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Krehnbrink v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Ross v. Auto Club GroupMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.