Legal Opinion

Stone v. Regents of University of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1999No. G020281PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEDSWORTH,J.

The Regents of the University of California (Regents) appeal from a judgment directing a writ of mandate issue to compel them to provide a defense to Sergio C. Stone in a civil action against him. The Regents argue they did not act arbitrarily in refusing to defend Stone, the evidence did not support the judgment, and Stone had an adequate remedy at law. Stone moves to dismiss the appeal, contending it was untimely and the Regents waived their right to appeal. We deny the motion because the appeal was timely and there was no waiver. We further find the Regents did not abuse…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. McGill v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Unruh-Haxton v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Torres v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Dakota Payphone, LLC v. AlcarazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Ryan v. California Interscholastic FederationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API