Legal Opinion
Laitram Corporation v. King Crab, Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided October 6, 1965No. Civ. A-32-62PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGE, District Judge.
Since the entry and publication of my opinion in the above-entitled case dated August 19, 1965, D.C., 244 F.Supp. 9, plaintiff filed herein a motion for new trial or, in the alternative, for an order amending the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law contained in the written opinion of the Court under the provisions of Rule 52, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
A new trial in this case would serve no useful purpose, as the issues were fully presented by both sides, and such motion must be denied. However, after hearing oral argument upon the alternative motion and after…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1952
- Laitram Corporation v. King Crab, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1965
- Berlenbach v. Anderson And Thompson Ski Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by12 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Usm Corporation v. Sps Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Hensley Equipment Company, Inc. v. Esco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.