McQueen v. Central Branch Union Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Atchison District Court. Action by McQueen against The Railroad Company, to re-cover damages for bodily injuries.' Trial at the June Term, 1881, and judgment for defendant. The plaintiff brings the ease here. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
*690The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
Action for personal injury. The court instructed the jury upon the facts proved upon the trial, that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and directed the jury to return a verdict for the company.
The principal question in this case is, whether the plaintiff was a passenger, or entitled to the rights of a passenger, at the time of his injury. The facts are substantially these: The plaintiff, on June 6, 1878, was, and for a year prior thereto had been, in the employ of the railroad company, painting depots, bridges, tanks and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hayden v. Smithville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. KenneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. MunroeIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Lumley v. CaswellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ewald v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Walker's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. PeaveySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. QuinlanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.