United States v. London
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
EARLY, Chief Judge:
Tried by general court-martial, military judge alone, the accused was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of unlawful entry, two specifications of larceny and willfully damaging property of the United States, in violation of Articles 130, 121 and 108, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 930, 921, 908. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 12 months, forfeiture of $200.00 per month for 12 months and reduction to airman basic.
In their first assignment of error, appellate defense counsel assert that the review…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. LanfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. GriffinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. KentU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. MeyerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1975
- United States v. ColdironU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. NarineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. HardenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. LondonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980