Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Jersey

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1902PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Motion to redeem in an action of foreclosure.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

The plight in which the defendants find themselves is one which appeals strongly to my sympathy, and I should be glad if I could see my way clear to relieve them. The action is for the foreclosure of a second mortgage for $415, executed no longer ago than January of the present year. The property involved is the home of the defendants, and subject to a first mortgage of $6,000. The action was begun on August 30, 1902, and no question is made but that the summons and complaint were served upon the defendants, or that all the proceedings in the *213action were fair and regular. The defendants did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nutt v. . CumingNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Brown v. FrostNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  3. Tuthill v. . TracyNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re ButchmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  2. Nimai Kumar Ghosh v. Financial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Nimai Kumar Ghosh)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  3. In Re: Sandralee Rodgers, Debtor, Sandralee Rodgers v. County of Monroe, William M. Lissow, and George M. ReiberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. In Re EllisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  5. Citibank, N. A. v. Press Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API