Legal Opinion

Tuthill v. . Tracy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1865PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was commenced by the appellants as heirs-at-law of Anson Tuthill, deceased, to redeem a mortgage executed by him, in his lifetime, to one Burbank. The facts, as found by the referee who tried the action, are: That said mortgage was dated on the 27th of January, 1834, and covered premises which descended to the appellants, on the death of the mortgagor, as his heirs-at-law; that said mortgage was purchased by one Aldrich, who proceeded to foreclose the same, under the statute; that the sale of the premises took place, pursuant to the statute, on the 25th of September, 1839. Several…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. FrostNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  2. Arnot v. McClureNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Cohoes Co. v. GossNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re: Sandralee Rodgers, Debtor, Sandralee Rodgers v. County of Monroe, William M. Lissow, and George M. ReiberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Field v. GoodingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Mowry v. . SanbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Barnard v. JerseyNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Citibank, N. A. v. Press Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API