Invensys Systems, Inc. v. Emerson Electric Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEONARD DAVIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,124,646 (“the '646 Patent”); 7,136,-761 (“the '761 Patent”); 6,311,136 (“the '136 Patent”); 7,505,854 (“the '854 Patent”); 6,754,594 (“the '594 Patent”); 7,571,062 (“the '062 Patent”); and 8,000,906 (“the '906 Patent”) (collectively, “the Invensys Patents”), asserted in this suit by Invensys Systems, Inc. (“Invensys”). Also before the Court is Micro Motion’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness (Docket No. 144).
On May 1, 2014, the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. v. E-One, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2022