Legal Opinion

Invensys Systems, Inc. v. Emerson Electric Co.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided August 6, 2014No. Case No. 6:12-cv-799PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEONARD DAVIS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This Memorandum Opinion construes the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,124,646 (“the '646 Patent”); 7,136,-761 (“the '761 Patent”); 6,311,136 (“the '136 Patent”); 7,505,854 (“the '854 Patent”); 6,754,594 (“the '594 Patent”); 7,571,062 (“the '062 Patent”); and 8,000,906 (“the '906 Patent”) (collectively, “the Invensys Patents”), asserted in this suit by Invensys Systems, Inc. (“Invensys”). Also before the Court is Micro Motion’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness (Docket No. 144).

On May 1, 2014, the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. v. E-One, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API