Legal Opinion

Red River Holdings, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 9, 2010No. 09-185 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*622OPINION

JAMES F. MEROW, Senior Judge.

In the post-award bid protest that preceded the instant motion for injunction pending appeal, the Military Sealift Command (“MSC”) solicited bids for a time charter party contract1 to warehouse military supplies at prepositioned locations at sea. Proposals were submitted by Red River Holdings, LLC (“Red River”) and Sealift, Inc. (“Sealift”). Following evaluation, a contract, consisting of an initial period of approximately 3.5 months, with four one-year options and a final option period estimated at 7.5 months, was awarded to Sealift.

Red River filed this…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Acrow Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Turner Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Hvf West, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API