Legal Opinion

Larrimore v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1913No. Civ. No. 1088PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting a new trial. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

In this action the plaintiff sued for and recovered a judgment against the defendant in the sum of one thousand dollars upon a policy of fidelity insurance, which was issued to the plaintiff by defendant as security for the integrity of one Charles A. Martinella, an employee of plaintiff. The case was tried with a jury and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff. Upon motion of the defendant the lower court ordered a new trial, from which the plaintiff has appealed.

The motion for the new trial was made upon all of the statutory grounds, and the order granting it is general in its terms.

It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RidgleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Young v. Pacific Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Isaac Upham Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API