Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Ridgley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1903No. 13,193PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Edward P. Holmes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Albert, C.

Harry B. Ridgley, whom we shall call the plaintiff, for present purposes, may be said to have been the owner of several stores and engaged in selling goods on the instalment plan, with headquarters at Des Moines, Iowa; one whom we shall call the employee was in his employ as manager of such stores, in the city of Lincoln. The plaintiff required the employee to furnish a fidelity bond, in the sum of $500, whereupon the employee made application therefor to the defendant company, whose home office is in the city of Baltimore, through its agents at Lincoln. The application was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Rice v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  4. Hoxie v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
  5. Blodgett v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marion Iron & Brass Bed Co. v. Empire State Surety Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Wainright Trust Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. American Radiator Co. v. American Bonding & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Larrimore v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. National Surety Co. v. RievesMississippi Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API