Legal Opinion

Young v. Pacific Surety Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1902No. S.F. No. 2333PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Welles Whitmore, P. L. Benjamin,, and John C. Hughes, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment of nonsuit, and involves the liability of a surety com pany upon a bond of indemnity issued in favor of plaintiff, an employer, and indemnifying him against the dishonesty of his cashier and bookkeeper.

In plaintiff’s application for the bond of indemnity he was asked the following question: “At what intervals will his books and accounts be examined and audited, and all moneys, securities, vouchers, and property on hand be examined and verified?” In reply he said, “Daily.” He was then asked the additional question: “By whom will this be done?” and his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunt v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Isaac Upham Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Larrimore v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API